Showing posts with label 2010 elections. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2010 elections. Show all posts

Monday, February 18, 2019

In Praise of Democrats

No doubt many readers will be put off by the unexpected title of this essay, so I'll hasten to add a crucial disclaimer: This article will not extol the godless, radically secularist ideology of the current Democratic Party leadership or its abominable methods of putting it into practice. Nor will it condemn the traditional Judeo-Christian values, strict constitutional government, and fiscal responsibility espoused by the current Republican Party leadership. Rather, my intention here is along the lines of Jesus' famous remark to his disciples that the children of this age are wiser in their generation than the children of light. My goal is to demonstrate that there is something truly praiseworthy in our worst political enemies, the Democrats, and that there is something truly blameworthy in our best political friends, the Republicans.

Looking back over the past ten years of contemporary American history, which includes eight years of President Obama and two years of President Trump, it becomes painfully obvious that the Democrats have been steadily gaining the upper hand in national and state politics. This increasing concentration of power in Democratic hands has been taking place despite the remarkable growth and ascendancy of the Tea Party movement which swept historic Republican majorities into the Senate, the House of Representatives, and state legislatures and state governorships across the nation in 2010 and 2014 and propelled Donald Trump into the White House in 2016. Ironically, Democrats are even more powerful and dangerous now in 2019, with majority control of the House alone, than they were in 2009 when they controlled the White House, the House and the Senate with a filibuster-proof supermajority in the latter chamber. How so?

In today's money-driven, politically polarized, social media-saturated culture, a political movement easily claims victory over its opposition based on the sums of money it raises and spends on advertising, the amount of media publicity it gets, and the number of seats and chambers it wins and holds in Washington and state capitals. Although these factors are to some extent important and necessary for any political movement to achieve national prominence, their sum does not automatically equal enduring influence. The true yardstick for measuring the long-term success of any U.S. political movement is its ability to accomplish its stated objectives. And the absolutely critical factor here is the movement's determination (or lack thereof) to implement its agenda.

During the past ten years, the Democrats have made it very clear that their agenda is to fundamentally transform America from a Judeo-Christian, Constitutional, pro-life, pro-family, small-government, low-tax, balanced-budget, market-economy-based, secure-borders nation into a godless, lawless, pro-abortion, anti-family, big-government, high-tax, high-debt, socialist, open-borders nation. Their toolkit to accomplish this has included lies, propaganda, secrecy, name-calling, character assassination, threats, and blackmail. Frankly, they've made substantial progress toward their revolutionary goal with the continued expulsion of God from our national life and public places, a litany of unconstitutional laws and executive orders from ObamaCare to DACA, maintaining taxpayer funding for Planned Parenthood, Supreme Court decisions upholding ObamaCare and striking down state marriage laws, swelling of the federal bureaucracy, high taxes, a national debt increase of $12 trillion, stifled economic growth, and a massive population of illegal immigrants.

The fact that most of this was accomplished with Republicans controlling one or both houses of Congress is a shining reflection on the bulldog tenacity of Democrats to see their agenda through, come what may. It's also a glaring reflection on the disappointing lack of determination by Republicans to implement their own agenda for the country. Supposedly, the Republicans want to keep America a Judeo-Christian, Constitutional, pro-life, pro-family, small-government, low-tax, fiscally responsible, market-economy-based, secure-borders nation. And it's true that in the past two years, President Trump and Congressional Republicans have taken some important steps to implement their agenda, reversing some of the damage wreaked by Democrats under President Obama. However, the Republicans have not been anywhere near as aggressive in implementing their good agenda as the Democrats have been in implementing their evil one. Worse, Democrats consistently make agenda-driven campaign promises and deliver on them, while Republicans tend to make agenda-driven campaign promises and renege on them.

Case in point: the ObamaCare monstrosity. Democrats promised it during the 2008 election campaign, and after winning that election, despite opposition from Republicans and two-thirds of the American people, they delivered, ramming the controversial bill through Congress and into law in 2010. Republicans promised to either repeal or de-fund it during the 2014 election season, but after winning that election, despite massive support for fulfilling their campaign promise, in 2015 Republicans led by House Speaker John Boehner caved in to President Obama's demand for money for his pet law. Again in 2016, Donald Trump and the Republicans solemnly pledged to repeal the Affordable Care Act [sic] and replace it with entirely new healthcare legislation in line with their own agenda. But while a Democratic-controlled White House, Senate and House in 2009 and 2010 proved entirely capable of enacting ObamaCare, a Republican-controlled White House, Senate and House in 2017 and 2018 proved entirely incapable of repealing it.

The fact that ObamaCare is still on the books today certainly demonstrates the staying power of the corrupt Washington establishment behind it (with which the Democrats are fully in bed), but more to the point here, it exemplifies the ominous trend of the past ten years in which Republicans are quickly throwing their campaign promises out the window, quietly setting their agenda aside, and gradually ceding more power to their Democratic enemies. The donkey's iron determination combined with the elephant's hushed timidity effectively renders the Democratic Party the majority party in America today. If this trend continues, within twenty years the Republican Party will find itself an irrelevant minority party, leaving the Democrats firmly in charge of national affairs.

Why have Republican politicians abandoned their core principles, betrayed their loyal constituents, and compromised their cherished values in this fashion? Apparently, for fear of the Democrats who are threatening them and have added the incitement of mob violence to their toolkit in their increasing desperation to further advance their radically secularist agenda. And apparently, Republicans are so scared of the above-mentioned establishment that they've been transformed into creatures of that very establishment, while still claiming to represent "we the people." They are now followers disguised as leaders. The Republicans' hypocrisy is sickening and their cowardice is frightening. I have to hand it to the Democrats: they know exactly what they want to achieve and how to achieve it, and come heck or high water, they're accomplishing it. Meanwhile, much of the wholesome agenda our country sorely needs languishes in the comfortable offices of House and Senate Republicans.

Yes, the Democratic bullies have lots of money and power thanks to the corrupt establishment and the "mainstream" media. But that's a poor excuse for Republicans to roll over and play dead. The Republican principles that made America great are worth defending as strenuously as possible, and since the Republican agenda based on those principles holds the key to America's long-term survival, it must be pushed with even more determination than the Democrats are pushing their rotten agenda if it is to succeed long-term. This means the Republicans must be "wise as serpents and simple as doves," taking full advantage of their own strengths and fully exploiting the Democrats' weaknesses. The Democrats may seem stronger at the moment in worldly terms, but Republicans have the far greater strengths of faith and trust in God, the revealed truths of natural law regarding human life and liberty, the wisdom and example of the Founders, prayer and fasting, and divine grace. If Republicans utilize their own strengths with sufficient determination and resolve for a sufficient period of time, America will be rescued from the tyranny of radical secularism. If not...


Copyright © 2019 Justin D. Soutar. All rights reserved.

Friday, March 7, 2014

The Importance and Potential of the Catholic Vote

(Note: This article originally appeared on the Intellectual Conservative Feb. 13, 2014 at http://intellectualconservative.com/the-importance-and-potential-of-the-catholic-vote/ and was re-published on EzineArticles Feb. 17, 2014 at http://ezinearticles.com/?The-Importance-and-Potential-of-the-Catholic-Vote&id=8326004 )

Almost any candidate running for president of the United States, for a state governorship, or for a U.S. Senate or House seat these days is clearly aware that he or she probably won’t win the election unless the better part of Catholics participating in that election choose to vote for him or her. In twenty-first century America, how Catholics vote generally determines the outcome of national and state election campaigns. The first presidential election of the century, the election of 2000, was an exception to this general rule, with Republican candidate George W. Bush barely scraping victory despite narrowly losing the Catholic vote. But in the more typical election of 2004, 52 percent of American Catholics cast their ballots for the Republican candidate, George W. Bush, resulting in his re-election as President of the United States. In 2008, on the other hand, Catholics opted for the Democratic candidate, Barack Obama, by a 55 percent margin, putting him in the White House by a comfortable margin. The historic 2010 midterm elections revealed Catholic voters as a major driving force of the Tea Party landslide: 58 percent of them chose Republican candidates for governor, House and Senate seats. Finally, U.S. Catholic voters tipped the close presidential election of 2012 in favor of Barack Obama by a margin of 50 to 48 percent—the same margin as the rest of the electorate.

The significance of the Catholic vote in American politics is unquestionable. But what exactly is this thing called “the Catholic vote,” and how does it work? To find out, let’s take a closer look at the political, social, and religious characteristics of the Catholics of the United States today.

Catholics are a complex and unique group politically. Although they comprise a substantial chunk of the U.S. population (roughly one-fourth or about 70 million), unlike Jews or Evangelicals, they are not overwhelmingly committed to a single political party. Rather, they’re split about 40/40 between the Republican and Democratic parties, while the remaining 20 percent or so are “swing voters,” those who aren’t firmly committed to either party and whose choices in a given election are shaped by a variety of superficial factors. It is these swing voters in each national election, as well as in most state elections, who determine whether the majority of Catholics goes for one party or the other and thus which party wins high office. So savvy politicians spend a great deal of money and effort to try to win this narrow demographic of Catholic swing voters, who comprise no more than 5 percent of the total U.S. electorate.

Part of the reason why Catholics as a whole are not committed to a single party is that they are a motley bunch, hailing from a variety of ethnic and economic backgrounds. They include Caucasians, Hispanics, Filipinos, other East Asians, African-Americans, rich and poor, business professionals and farm workers, urban and rural folk. Catholics are found in every milieu of American society; they inhabit every state and geographical region of the country (although they are spread more thinly in the South). These characteristics set Catholics apart from other religious groups, such as the Protestant majority (which is mostly white and Republican) and Jews (who are mainly Democrats and confined to the largest cities). Thus, it can be said that, given their political, ethnic and economic diversity, Catholics are generally representative of the nation as a whole.

The political characteristics of American Catholics are greatly influenced by how they believe and practice their faith. Less than one-fourth of them are faithful, practicing Catholics who allow their faith to shape their voting decisions and who follow the guidance of their bishops regarding both the negotiable and the non-negotiable issues at stake. For these good Catholics, the right to life of innocent unborn children, the definition of marriage as the union of a man and a woman, the right of the Church to act in accord with its teachings and the rights of Americans to act in accord with their moral consciences and religious beliefs, and the right to life of the ill and elderly are of fundamental importance in choosing which candidate to vote for. While a candidate’s positions on other issues such as poverty, war, immigration, taxes, health care, or the economy are carefully considered as well, these negotiable issues are ultimately subservient to the non-negotiable issues of life, family, the moral law and human rights that form the very cornerstone of society. Since the Democratic Party has fervently embraced abortion and deliberately ostracized pro-life candidates, these devout Catholics usually end up voting Republican even if that runs against their preference because they have no other choice in good conscience. They are not necessarily loyal Republicans, and many of them are would-be Democrats. They are de facto Republicans whose voting habits are consistent and easily predictable.

Unfortunately, more than 75 percent of American registered Catholics do not even fulfill their basic religious obligation of attending Mass every Sunday, and of these non-practicing Catholics, a substantial portion are “cafeteria Catholics” (heretics) who refuse to accept certain teachings of the Church. Included within this latter group is the 40 percent of all U.S. Catholics who believe that a woman has a right to an abortion under certain circumstances. Also included within this group is the lion’s share of the more than 50 percent of American Catholics who use artificial contraception within their marriages in violation of Church teaching. These staggering numbers indicate a serious crisis of faith in the American Catholic Church, and they betray grave problems in the Catholic vote. Many of these so-called Catholics always vote Democratic regardless of their candidate’s position on life and marriage; some always vote Republican, even when the Republican candidate supports legalized abortion and same-sex “marriage”; and the remainder are swing voters who pick their party and candidate in each election with little or selective regard for Church teaching on the issues. Some nominal Catholics do agree with the Church that abortion is gravely immoral, but this does not stop them from voting for pro-abortion candidates in clear violation of Church teaching.

Within this overwhelming multitude of Catholics in name only, which includes some 60 million Americans, it is swing voters who determine the role that the Catholic vote plays in each national election as well as in most state elections. Catholic swing voters reelected President Bush in 2004 (that was good), elected President Obama in 2008 (that was bad), helped push the Tea Party to gubernatorial and Congressional victories in 2010 (that was good), and reelected President Obama in 2012 (that was bad). The fact that 55 percent of American Catholics helped put in the White House the most radically pro-abortion president in our nation’s history, and that 50 percent chose to reelect him despite his blatant attacks on the moral law, the Catholic Church, religious liberty and moral conscience rights, is a crying shame. These tragic results were due to Catholic swing voters allying with the substantial minority of Democratic pro-abortion Catholics.

Of course, it’s great when Catholic swing voters do the opposite, and join forces with faithful Catholics and staunch Republican Catholics to assure a victory for human rights and traditional values. In a triumphant press release following the historic 2010 midterm elections, Bill Donohue of the Catholic League announced that “Catholics voted 58-40 for the Republican candidates last night.” He noted that “[t]his was a dramatic 20-point swing from two years ago,” but then added, “What caused Catholics to bolt is not clear.” The reason for this dramatic swing was Catholic swing voters riding the wave of Tea Party enthusiasm that swept the country in reaction to President Obama’s unpopular and immoral healthcare reform law—which is now unfortunately in effect, thanks to those same swing voters having reverted to the Democratic Party two years later.

The fact of the matter is that these Catholic swingers, together with the vast assemblage of non-practicing Catholics in general, are essentially indistinguishable from the secular society and culture around them. They think and vote the way the people around them think and vote; their Catholic faith has little or nothing to do with it. Because they are not well-grounded in their faith, they allow the winds of fashion and popular opinion to blow them to and fro like rudderless sailboats. In 2008 the winds were blowing gently towards the Democrats, so that’s the way they headed. In 2010 the winds sharply shifted course towards Tea Party Republicans, so they caught the gusts and sailed along in that direction.

It is unfortunately true that Catholics in name only control the power of the American Catholic vote by virtue of their sheer numerical monopoly. That is a scandal. What’s even worse is that this situation is allowed to persist by another group we have not yet mentioned: millions of otherwise good practicing Catholics who don’t bother to register or go to the polls on Election Day. These Catholic non-voters frequently and adversely affect the outcome of elections by their failure to participate in the political process. Together with Catholics in name only, they are traitors to both their Church and their country. If these otherwise good Catholics were mobilized to do their duty to God and country, they would add to the faithful Catholics who already vote and help to neutralize the deleterious effects of the Catholic swing voters, thus critically influencing the outcome of important elections. It’s a shame to see the Catholic vote split among pro-abortion Catholics, faithful Catholics and swing Catholics who ignore or selectively apply Church teaching on the issues, while other Catholics just sit by and watch. These divisions are preventing the Catholic vote from achieving its true potential as a great force for good in our country. Meanwhile, so-called “Catholic” politicians eagerly exploit the Catholic vote for their own political gain while promoting a woman’s “right” to abortion or attacking the Church’s right to practice its teachings in public life.

The good news, however, is that these grave problems with the American Catholic vote can be overcome. In fact, change for the better within the American Catholic Church is not only possible, it is gradually unfolding before our eyes. Most “cafeteria Catholics” are over the age of 60, while most faithful Catholics are 45 and under. Young Catholics in particular are fervently dedicated to the pro-life cause. This was nowhere more clearly demonstrated than in the March for Life in Washington, D.C. in January 2013. Of the more than 800,000 people who took part in this event, a majority were Catholic teenagers and younger adults born since Roe v. Wade. This army of young, pro-life Catholics—some of whom were elected to state governorships and U.S. House and Senate seats in 2010 and 2012—continues to grow, while pro-abortion Catholics in the mold of Ted Kennedy are gradually declining and dying out. Younger Catholic priests are not afraid to speak from the pulpit the truth about the evils of abortion, artificial contraception, and gay “marriage,” and their numbers are slowly on the rise as well.

Imagine what the Catholic vote would be like if American Catholics were solidly united in the full belief and faithful practice of the religion they profess! Just imagine what would happen if all Catholic voters in the United States voted in accordance with Church teaching in every election. No pro-abortion candidate for president or governor would ever make it into public office; nor would most such candidates for U.S. Senate and House seats. Politicians would have a holy fear of the Catholic vote, knowing that to publicly take a pro-abortion or pro-gay “marriage” stand would cost them the support of their Catholic constituents. Furthermore, the already massive and growing pro-life, pro-marriage and religious liberty movements would be much stronger and even more effective if our elected representatives had four times as many Catholic constituents knocking on their doors and pressuring them to do away with legalized abortion, gay “marriage” and the HHS mandate. If every American Catholic citizen took seriously his or her grave moral obligation to form and vote his or her conscience in accord with Church teaching, we would have a different and much better country. And all this would happen if only Americans who currently profess to be Catholic took their faith seriously. The Catholic vote would take on even more formidable proportions if half of all American ex-Catholics—another 50 million people—were to return to the Church and begin voting as faithful Catholics. Imagine the beneficial consequences to our country of such a massive reversion to Catholicism!

As Catholics vote, so goes the nation. Good Catholics make good citizens. The sacraments (especially the Holy Eucharist and Confession), prayer (especially the Holy Rosary), and sound catechesis are the keys to revitalizing and renewing the Catholic Church in the United States—and in so doing, to unlock the hidden potential of the Catholic vote and make it truly a force to be reckoned with in future elections.

Copyright © 2014 Justin D. Soutar. All rights reserved.

Thursday, November 11, 2010

Election Report: The Pro-Life Elect

AMERICA'S PRO-LIFE ELECT -- 2010
List compiled by Justin Soutar
December 1, 2010

There were many victories for the pro-life movement and traditional values in this year's election. Following is a complete state-by-state list of all pro-life governors, senators and representatives newly elected or re-elected in 2010. (NOTE: Only individuals who could be positively identified as pro-life are listed here. Elected individuals whose position on abortion is unknown or unclear have been omitted from the list.)

Triple stars denote the newly elected pro-life individuals; no stars, re-elected pro-life incumbents. All individuals belong to the Republican Party unless otherwise identified as Democrats. (Double stars indicate a pro-life Democrat.)

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

ALABAMA
Governor -- *** Robert Bentley ***
Senator -- Richard Shelby
Representatives –
*** Martha Roby ***
*** Mo Brooks ***
Mike Rogers
Spencer Bachus
Robert Aderholt
Jo Bonner

ALASKA
Representatives --
Don Young

ARIZONA
Governor -- Jan Brewer
Senator -- John McCain
Representatives –
*** Paul Gosar ***
*** David Schweikert ***
Trent Franks
Jeff Flake

ARKANSAS
Senator -- *** John Boozman ***
Representatives –
*** Rick Crawford ***
*** Tim Griffin ***
*** Steve Womack ***
Mike Ross (**Pro-Life Democrat**)

CALIFORNIA
Representatives --
*** Jeff Denham ***
Duncan Hunter
Darrell Issa
Ken Calvert
John Campbell
Gary Miller
Ed Royce
Dana Rohrabacher
David Dreier
Jerry Lewis
Buck McKeon
Elton Gallegly
Kevin McCarthy
Devin Nunes
Dan Lungren
Wally Herger
Tom McClintock

COLORADO
Representatives --
*** Cory Gardner ***
*** Scott Tipton ***
Mike Coffman
Doug Lamborn

FLORIDA
Governor -- *** Rick Scott ***
Senator -- *** Marco Rubio ***
Representatives –
*** David Rivera ***
*** Mario Diaz-Balart ***
*** Dennis Ross ***
*** Sandy Adams ***
*** Daniel Webster ***
*** Richard Nugent ***
*** Steve Southerland ***
Ileana Ros-Lehtinen
Tom Rooney
Connie Mack
Vern Buchanan
Bill Posey
Gus Bilirakis
Bill Young
John Mica
Ander Crenshaw
Cliff Stearns
Jeff Miller

GEORGIA
Governor -- *** Nathan Deal ***
Senator -- Johnny Isakson
Representatives –
*** Austin Scott ***
*** Rob Woodall ***
Jack Kingston
Paul Broun
Lynn Westmoreland
Tom Graves
Tom Price
Phil Gingrey

IDAHO
Governor -- Butch Otter
Senator -- Mike Crapo
Representatives –
*** Raul Labrador ***
Mike Simpson

ILLINOIS
Representatives --
*** Adam Kinzinger ***
*** Joe Walsh ***
*** Randy Hultgren ***
*** Bobby Schilling ***
Tim Johnson
Peter Roskam
Donald Manzullo
Aaron Schock
John Shimkus
Dan Lipinski (**Pro-Life Democrat**)
Jerry Costello (**Pro-Life Democrat**)

INDIANA
Senator -- *** Dan Coats ***
Representatives –
*** Todd Young ***
*** Larry Bucshon ***
*** Todd Rokita ***
*** Marlin Stutzman ***
Mike Pence
Dan Burton
Joe Donnelly (**Pro-Life Democrat**)

IOWA
Senator -- Chuck Grassley
Representatives –
Tom Latham
Steve King

KANSAS
Governor -- *** Sam Brownback ***
Senator -- *** Jerry Moran ***
Representatives –
*** Mike Pompeo ***
*** Tim Huelskamp ***

KENTUCKY
Senator -- *** Rand Paul ***
Representatives –
Hal Rogers
Ed Whitfield
Brett Guthrie
Geoff Davis

LOUISIANA
Senator -- David Vitter
Representatives –
*** Jeff Landry ***
Steve Scalise
Bill Cassidy
Rodney Alexander
Charles Boustany
John Fleming

MARYLAND
Representatives –
*** Andy Harris ***
Roscoe Bartlett

MICHIGAN
Governor -- *** Rick Snyder ***
Representatives –
*** Tim Walberg ***
*** Justin Amash ***
*** Bill Huizenga ***
*** Dan Benishek ***
Mike Rogers
Candice Miller
Thaddeus McCotter
Dave Camp

MINNESOTA
Representatives –
*** Chip Cravaack ***
Michele Bachmann
Erik Paulsen
John Kline
Collin Peterson (**Pro-Life Democrat**)

MISSISSIPPI
Representatives –
*** Steven Palazzo ***
*** Alan Nunnelee ***
Gregg Harper

MISSOURI
Senator -- *** Roy Blunt ***
Representatives –
*** Billy Long ***
*** Vicky Hartzler ***
Jo Ann Emerson
Todd Akin
Blaine Luetkemeyer
Sam Graves

MONTANA
Representative -- Denny Rehberg

NEBRASKA
Governor -- Dave Heineman
Representatives –
Lee Terry
Jeff Fortenberry
Adrian Smith

NEVADA
Representatives –
*** Joe Heck ***
Dean Heller

NEW HAMPSHIRE
Senator -- *** Kelly Ayotte ***
Representatives –
*** Frank Guinta ***

NEW JERSEY
Representatives --
Chris Smith
Frank LoBiondo
Scott Garrett

NEW MEXICO
Governor -- *** Susana Martinez ***
Representatives –
*** Steve Pearce ***

NEW YORK
Representatives --
*** Chris Gibson ***
*** Nan Hayworth ***
*** Richard Hanna ***
*** Michael Grimm ***
*** Tom Reed ***
Peter King

NORTH CAROLINA
Senator -- Richard Burr
Representatives –
*** Renee Ellmers ***
Walter Jones
Howard Coble
Mike McIntyre (**Pro-Life Democrat**)
Virginia Foxx
Patrick McHenry
Heath Shuler (**Pro-Life Democrat**)

NORTH DAKOTA
Senator -- *** John Hoeven ***
Representative – *** Rick Berg ***

OHIO
Governor -- *** John Kasich ***
Senator -- *** Rob Portman ***
Representatives –
*** Bill Johnson ***
*** Jim Renacci ***
*** Bob Gibbs ***
*** Steve Stivers ***
*** Steve Chabot ***
Steve LaTourette
Steve Austria
Pat Tiberi
Jim Jordan
Bob Latta
Mike Turner
Jean Schmidt
John Boehner

OKLAHOMA
Governor -- *** Mary Fallin ***
Senator -- Tom Coburn
Representatives –
*** James Lankford ***
Dan Boren (**Pro-Life Democrat**)
John Sullivan
Frank Lucas
Tom Cole

PENNSYLVANIA
Governor -- *** Tom Corbett ***
Senator -- *** Pat Toomey ***
Representatives –
*** Mike Kelly ***
*** Mike Fitzpatrick ***
*** Lou Barletta ***
*** Tom Marino ***
Jim Gerlach
Joe Pitts
Todd Platts
Tim Holden (**Pro-Life Democrat**)
Glenn Thompson
Mark Critz (**Pro-Life Democrat**)
Bill Shuster
Tim Murphy

RHODE ISLAND
Representatives --
Jim Langevin (**Pro-Life Democrat**)

SOUTH CAROLINA
Governor -- *** Nikki Haley ***
Senator -- Jim DeMint
Representatives –
*** Tim Scott ***
*** Mick Mulvaney ***
*** Jeff Duncan ***
Joe Wilson

SOUTH DAKOTA
Governor -- *** Dennis Daugaard ***
Senator -- John Thune
Representatives –
*** Kristi Noem ***

TENNESSEE
Governor -- *** Bill Haslam ***
Representatives –
*** Chuck Fleischmann ***
*** Scott DesJarlais ***
*** Diane Black ***
*** Stephen Fincher ***
John Duncan
Phil Roe
Marsha Blackburn

TEXAS
Governor -- Rick Perry
Representatives –
*** Bill Flores ***
*** Quico Canseco ***
*** Blake Farenthold ***
Ron Paul
Pete Olson
Ted Poe
Kevin Brady
Louie Gohmert
Ralph Hall
Jeb Hensarling
Joe Barton
Michael McCaul
John Culberson
John Carter
Sam Johnson
Kenny Marchant
Michael Burgess
Kay Granger
Pete Sessions
Mac Thornberry
Randy Neugebauer
Mike Conaway
Lamar Smith

UTAH
Senator -- *** Mike Lee ***
Representatives –
Jason Chaffetz
Rob Bishop

VIRGINIA
Representatives –
*** Robert Hurt ***
*** Scott Rigell ***
*** Morgan Griffith ***
Rob Wittman
Eric Cantor
Frank Wolf
Randy Forbes
Bob Goodlatte

WASHINGTON
Representatives --
*** Jaime Herrera ***
Cathy McMorris Rodgers
Doc Hastings
Dave Reichert

WEST VIRGINIA
Representatives –
*** David McKinley ***
Nick Rahall (**Pro-Life Democrat**)

WISCONSIN
Governor -- *** Scott Walker ***
Senator -- *** Ron Johnson ***
Representatives –
*** Reid Ribble ***
*** Sean Duffy ***
Tom Petri
Jim Sensenbrenner
Paul Ryan

WYOMING
Governor -- *** Matt Mead ***
Representative -- Cynthia Lummis


Copyright © 2010 by Justin Soutar. All rights reserved. For reprint permissions, please contact the author at justin_86@ntelos.net.

Thursday, November 4, 2010

Election Report: First Installment

There were many victories for the pro-life movement and traditional values in this election. Here is a list of all pro-life candidates elected to the U.S. Senate who are new to Washington, D.C. or to the Senate:

*** Kelly Ayotte (New Hampshire) ***
*** Marco Rubio (Florida) ***
*** Pat Toomey (Pennsylvania) ***
*** Rand Paul (Kentucky) ***
*** Rob Portman (Ohio) ***
*** Dan Coats (Indiana) ***
*** Ron Johnson (Wisconsin) ***
*** Roy Blunt (Missouri) ***
*** Jerry Moran (Kansas) ***
*** John Boozman (Arkansas) ***
*** John Hoeven (North Dakota) ***
*** Mike Lee (Utah) ***

Here is a list of pro-life senators who were re-elected.

Jim DeMint (South Carolina)
Johnny Isakson (Georgia)
Richard Shelby (Alabama)
Richard Burr (North Carolina)
Chuck Grassley (Iowa)
David Vitter (Louisiana)
Tom Coburn (Oklahoma)
John Thune (South Dakota)
Mike Crapo (Idaho)
John McCain (Arizona)

Following is a list of newly elected pro-life governors.

*** John Kasich (Ohio) ***
*** Sam Brownback (Kansas) ***
*** Tom Corbett (Pennsylvania) ***
*** Rick Snyder (Michigan) ***
*** Scott Walker (Wisconsin) ***
*** Rick Scott (Florida) ***
*** Nikki Haley (South Carolina) ***
*** Nathan Deal (Georgia) ***
*** Robert Bentley (Alabama) ***
*** Bill Haslam (Tennessee) ***
*** Dennis Daugaard (South Dakota) ***
*** Mary Fallin (Oklahoma) ***
*** Matt Mead (Wyoming) ***
*** Susana Martinez (New Mexico) ***

The following pro-life governors have been re-elected.

Dave Heineman (Nebraska)
Rick Perry (Texas)
Jan Brewer (Arizona)
Butch Otter (Idaho)

Here is a partial listing of newly elected pro-life representatives (I have yet to gather data on the remaining 226):
*** Frank Guinta (New Hampshire) ***
*** Chris Gibson (New York) ***
*** Nan Hayworth (New York) ***
*** Richard Hanna (New York) ***
*** Tom Reed (New York) ***
*** Jon Runyan (New Jersey) ***
*** Mike Kelly (Pennsylvania) ***
*** Robert Hurt (Virginia) ***

The following pro-life representatives have been re-elected.

Peter King (New York)
Chris Smith (New Jersey)
Frank LoBiondo (New Jersey)
Scott Garrett (New Jersey)
Eric Cantor (Virginia)

Note: For the purposes of these lists, "Pro-life" does not necessarily mean 100% pro-life in accordance with natural law and Catholic teaching. Many of the newly elected candidates listed above are 100% pro-life, but some are not. Check individual governors, senators and representatives-elect to be sure.

Thursday, September 16, 2010

ElectionWatch: More Republican Victories


On September 14, more new names and faces burst onto the rapidly changing American political scene. The following Republican candidates who represent the American people were nominated to, and are now officially running for, public office in the United States:
  • In Delaware, Christine O'Donnell for the U.S. Senate. (Note that the Senate seat for which O'Donnell is competing was formerly occupied by current U.S. Vice President Joe Biden.)

  • In New York, Carl Paladino for state governor.

These candidates join a slew of Republican Senate nominees, most of whom are now leading in the polls:

  • Marco Rubio in Florida
  • Sharron Angle in Nevada
  • Rand Paul in Kentucky
  • Ken Buck in Colorado
  • Joe Miller in Alaska

I hate to spoil the upbeat attitude of our ElectionWatch coverage with a sour note, but integrity and respect for the truth demand that I do so briefly. Note that a few of the Republican nominees present serious objections for the conscientious voter. For example, I would definitely not vote for Linda McMahon in Connecticut because, although an outsider to Washington, D.C., she is pro-abortion and represents values I disagree with. A few other of the Republican nominees, although definite improvements over the Democratic incumbents they are challenging, do have some drawbacks. For example, Kelly Ayotte, who narrowly won the Republican Senate nomination in New Hampshire, is pro-life but favors allowing abortion in cases of rape or incest. By contrast, Ovide Lamontagne, who narrowly lost nomination, is pro-life "without exception." I would have preferred to see the latter win this Senate nomination. Nonetheless, despite these exceptions, the overall political trend we are witnessing in the United States is a positive one.

Many of the Republican candidates now running for U.S. House and Senate seats, including those named at the top of this post, are outsiders to Washington, D.C., which is quite refreshing. More importantly than that, however, is what they stand for and the quality of their character. Collectively derided as the "Tea Party" and dubbed "right-wing extremists" in the major media, this remarkable group of individuals actually represents the main stream of the American people--a people who are utterly disappointed with the broken promises of the corrupt Obama administration. These new candidates are pro-life, they stand for limited government, and they favor tax cuts to help reinvigorate the economy. Political outsiders, they represent a rising new generation of God-fearing, conscientious statesmen and women who are devoted to public service and determined to make things right in Washington. This historic movement is the Republican Revolution of 2010.

Praised be God, who exalts the humble.

Thursday, September 9, 2010

ElectionWatch -- Focus on Ohio

As our nation prepares to vote in the upcoming general elections on November 2, 2010, certain states stand to gain or lose more than others. Ohio will be an interesting state to watch because of the multiple races underway there. In addition to electing all twenty of their representatives to Congress, residents of the Buckeye State will be choosing a new senator and casting their ballots for governor. Right now Ohio has two senators, Republican George Voinovich elected in 2004 and Democrat Sherrod Brown elected in 2006. The state's governor, Democrat Ted Strickland, was also elected in 2006. Given the current mood of the nation, it's likely that Ohioans will pick another Republican to fill the Senate seat left by Voinovich. In fact, polls show Republican Senate candidate Rob Portman with a clear lead over the Democratic contender, outgoing lieutenant governor Lee Fisher.

Even more significant, however, would be a Republican takeover of the state's governorship. Strickland is running for a second term with lots of money, political experience and support among his age group; however, he has several strikes against him. He is pro-abortion and has failed to cut taxes during the worst economic recession in 40 years. Strickland faces a good challenge from pro-life Republican candidate John Kasich. Both gubernatorial candidates have picked women as their running mates for lieutenant governor: Strickland has chosen Yvette Brown, while Kasich has selected Mary Taylor, the current state auditor. I don't know anything about Brown, but Taylor appears to be pro-life and is also an advocate for homeschooling.

Another reason why Ohio will be an interesting state to watch on election night is that it serves as a barometer of the country as a whole. Unlike most states, Ohio's population is split pretty evenly between Republicans and Democrats, city and country folk. As Ohio goes, so goes the nation. A recent poll of registered voters in the Buckeye State showed the needle tipped way over to the Republican side there, with 75 percent of Republicans determined to vote compared to 56 percent of Democrats. It looks like a powerful storm is brewing for Democratic politicians in Washington. If Republicans take over Ohio, including the governorship, it will spell definite bad news for the Obama administration in 2012.

Wednesday, September 1, 2010

I'm Registered to Vote...

...How about you? If your voter registration status for the upcoming election is in doubt, find it out. If you're already registered, good for you. If not, get on the rolls. Most states have deadlines for voter registration prior to an election. This upcoming election will be important, especially for the unborn and for our economy. Be sure to participate in it.

"The very least a loyal son of his country can do is to cast his vote for good men." --Father F. X. Lasance, The Young Man's Guide, p. 446

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

ElectionWatch Update: 3 Updates


August 11, 2010: Four Republican outsiders to Washington, D.C. have now been nominated to the U.S. Senate: Ken Buck in Colorado, Rand Paul in Kentucky, Marco Rubio in Florida and Sharron Angle in Nevada.

August 17, 2010: In a Reuters/Ipsos poll of likely Kentucky voters, Republican Senate candidate Rand Paul led his Democratic opponent Jack Conway 45 percent to 40 percent.

August 25, 2010: In Alaska, polls showed Republican Senate candidate Joe Miller holding a slight lead over incumbent Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski. Miller has the support of Sarah Palin.

Also in Arizona, longtime Republican Senator John McCain has been nominated for a fifth term. He had lost the 2008 presidential election to Barack Obama.

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Americans Unhappy with Dems on Economy


With midterm Congress- ional elections just over three months away, American dissatisfaction with the triple-blue Democratic administration they elected to Washington in 2008 persists and continues to grow. On Tuesday, July 27, Reuters-Ipsos released a survey showing significant disapproval of Democrats' efforts to revive the troubled economy. Americans rightly consider the economy an issue of major importance and believe that the administration of President Barack Obama has not adequately addressed it. According to the survey, 67 percent of respondents said that President Obama hasn't done enough to create jobs.

The reason why this administration has not adequately addressed our nation's economic woes is that President Obama and many of the Democrats in Congress are the pawns of special interests. They only pretend to care about the American people. That's why they spent $868 billion dollars to bail out the big banks instead of punishing them for irresponsible lending. That's why we have a war in Afghanistan still going on nine years later. That's why we have a vast new government bureaucracy including abortion "coverage" to help take care of our health, and new taxes for those who don't want to be a part of it. That's also why we don't have real tax cuts for working families and small businesses and major cuts in federal spending--measures that would help the American people to rebuild the economy on a solid foundation. The corruption runs deep. It is also why Americans are unhappy with the Dems on almost every issue, not just the economy.

As Democrats in D.C. continue losing support and momentum, Republicans are gaining it. The Reuters-Ipsos poll indicated that 46 percent of Americans plan to vote Republican this November, compared to 44 percent who intend to vote Democratic. Furthermore, nearly three-fourths of Republicans (72 percent) said they are certain to vote in November, compared to less than half of Democrats.

Republican candidates for U.S. House and Senate seats appear increasingly likely to score major victories this fall. May those who win election go on to win the trust, respect and approval of their constituents through faithful public service for many years to come.

Thursday, June 3, 2010

ElectionWatch 2010 Unveils Official Logo

Here is the official logo for ElectionWatch 2010, your trustworthy source for news and information about the Congressional election campaign. We will also be bringing you the full, state-by-state results of the U.S. House and Senate elections this coming November. So stay tuned!

Friday, May 21, 2010

Specter Out: Paul Up, Others Coming

More good news from ElectionWatch 2010! In Pennsylvania, veteran senator Arlen Specter (a Democrat) loses his party's nomination for another U.S. Senate term. In Kentucky, Republican candidate Rand Paul, the son of Ron Paul, wins his party's nomination for the Senate by a landslide, defeating establish- ment fav- orite Trey Grayson. In Arkan -sas, the re-nomina- tion of Demo- cratic senator Blanche Lincoln hangs in the balance as state voters there await a runoff election.

The results of these Senate primary elections are the latest in a string of disasters for the Obama administration since late 2009, including the election of Republican governors in New Jersey and Virginia, the election of a Republican senator in Massachusetts and the decisions of several incumbent Democratic senators not to seek re-election in 2010.

As Rand Paul said after his nomination, this is democracy at work. The American people are telling Washington in no uncertain terms that they've had it with abortion, big government, high taxes and a dragging economy. A Republican Revolution is underway!

I don't care if they call me a tea-party activist. I'm excited to see these developments! They are paving the way for the kind of changes our country needs.